Sometime ago I wrote that we must enact laws that would make it mandatory for all public officers in Nigeria to receive medical treatment only in Nigeria,and for their children to attend only Nigerian schools and for them to invest only in Nigeria, (at least for the duration of their public service, or disservice if you will). I received a lot of feedback and most agreed with my suggestion, but there where some who very vocally and publicly complained that enacting such laws would infringe on the fundamental rights of our public officials.
Now these types of responses remind me of the psychological disorder known as Stockholm Syndrome, which is characterized by victims having loyalties to their abusers. This Stockholm syndrome is daily played out in Nigeria and may perhaps explain why there is so much resistance to positive change on the part of our public officials.
Let me explain. Nigerian elite and the middle class love to complain about the state of Nigeria. In fact I daresay that if you gather three or more Nigerians together, one of two things will dominate the conversation and that is foot ball or politics. And we are very passionate about the two. Nigerians complain about the government, corruption and mismanagement which is as it should be. But the part that gets me is that these same Nigerians are nearly always star star struck when they come into the presence of these men who man our positions of power and who are the cause of so much misery.
To give a vidid example, I was watching the BBC not too long ago and there was a noted Nigerian civil rights activist who had been invited to comment on an issue in Nigeria. Apparently the Nigerian Government had made a claim about a civil disturbance and the BBC had obtained evidence that put that claim to doubt and wanted this activist to weigh in. Imagine my surprise when the activist ponctuated every reference he made to the minister in question with the words ‘the honourable’. He used this term a total of 12 times in a 3 minute speech. Now after watching this interview, one may be forgiven if they thought that civil society groups in Nigeria are an extension of the government. This is not to say that civil activist should not respect government officials-far from it, however there is a difference between respect and boot licking!
This fawning over high profile officials is so widespread and prevalent that even when it is expected that Nigerians have had it and are actually fed up with the daily instances of mismanagement of their national patrimony, you end up being surprised by the actions of the people who are victims of this mismanagement. Is it that we have become so used to our predicament that we would rather remain the way we are?
Going back to the issue I started with, my readers may perhaps want to know that the only way you can change peoples behaviour is by changing their roles. Presently, Nigerian politicians do not patronize Nigerian medical facilities, so how can they actually be stake holders in improving the Nigerian health care delivery system? The key to participation is involvement. They are not involved in the process, so how can they participate? And if they can not participate, how can we ever expect any improvement being that they are the ones in charge of making the improvement?
It is the same thing with education. Nigerian public officials do not care about the deteriorating public education sector in Nigeria for the simple reason that they are not participants. Their kids do not attend public schools, as a matter of fact, most of them school their kids abroad. So if they are not affected, how can they care enough to improve this sector?
There in lies the dilemma we face. Our public officials are not total participants in the Nigerian project in that they access most of their vital services abroad. As the philosopher once said, where your treasure is so also will your heart be, many of our public officials have their treasures over seas, and there is where their heart is.
Now to all those who wrote that my suggestion that we salvage the situation by enacting laws to make it mandatory for public officials to use only Nigerian medical facilities and have their wards educated only in Nigerian schools as well as invest only in Nigeria , to all those who wrote that this would infringe on their rights, I remind them that rights come from legislation and the grundnorm of all legislations in Nigeria is the Nigerian constitution which provides that ALL Nigerian citizens have a right to education, a right to employment and to good health and that it is the principal responsibility of government to promote these rights and as such any actions that will impede on these rights will in essence be in violation of the constitution and can therefore not be a right. The Nigerian constitution, as imperfect as it currently is, codifies our social contract with our government and while there is sufficient evidence to support the argument that it should be amended, there are enough provisions contained in it that can be explored by creative persons to spur the enactment of sub laws that will give greater effect to the elementary civil rights contained in the constitution.
The truth is that unless government officials have no alternative to Nigerian health care, they will never be fully committed to improving healthcare facilities in Nigeria.
A good example would be the late General Sani Abacha, who, because of the travel sanctions imposed on him, could not travel to the West was left with no other option but to build a state of the art medical facility at the Aso rock villa to cater for his liver cirrhosis ailment. Not stopping there, his wife also built a state of the art hospital in Abuja then called Women and Children Hospital, but which has since been renamed The National Hospital, and is today the most modern hospital in Nigeria. Do you now see how condition drives behaviour? The political conditions of the time which made Nigeria an international pariah under his administration was the catalyst that changed Abacha’s status from being an onlooker in the Nigerian Health care sector to a stake holder and participant, and it was this that led him to invest in the hospital in the villa.
Another example in the education sector will also suffice. The same General Abacha had a daughter who read law in the United Kingdom, and the media reported that because of the deep unpopularity of his administration in the Southwest, he felt it was a security risk to have her attend the Nigerian Law School in Lagos. So what was his solution? He created another Law School in Abuja, and instead of one Law School, Nigeria had two. In time this decision led to the creation of Law Schools in Kano and Enugu, which was progressive to legal education and consequently to the legal profession and ultimately to the Nigerian state. But the catalyst of this chain reaction was the the prevailing circumstances at that time which changed Abacha’s status from that of an onlooker to a stake holder in the Legal education sector. Now imagine would have happened if his daughter was also placed on travel sanctions. Obviously he would have built better universities in Nigeria to cater for his daughter and his other kids because he would have been forced to become a stake holder in the Nigerian education sector and not just legal education.
It is within this frame of reference that people should see my suggestion that we should enact the laws I suggested. Not because I am draconian, nor because I am playing to the gallery, or because I want to infringe on peoples right. It is because I know through study that changing peoples roles is the key to changing peoples behaviour because wherever your interests lie is where you focus your attention and where you focus your attention is where you see improvements.
You see in the final analysis, we must understand that Nigeria is in a desperate state. Our population is increasing geometrically, while our resources are dwindling. At the same time corruption is on the rise and we have a rapacious political elite. This is a lethal combination that is breeding discontent and extreme poverty amongst the masses and this is the desperate disease that is causing symptoms such as the Boko Haram crisis, Niger Delta militancy, the increasing state of insecurity in the country (which as Jubril Aminu rightly pointed out is worse now than it was in most parts of the country during the civil war). This desperate disease which affects Nigeria calls for desperate remedies and we have to use creative and radical approaches to bring about rapid development that will result in the improvement of our rapidly crumbling social services in Nigeria. We should not wait until we get to the level of Somalia where Central authority collapsed due in large part to the silence of the middle class and elite in the face of brutal oppression by the ruling class. The time to act is now.
Once again, God bless Nigeria.
PU.