Like Truman, Like Jonathan.

Now that Vice President Goodluck Jonathan has assumed the presidency albeit in an acting capacity, it is now his responsibility to set the machinery of government moving again because we all are aware that government business almost ground to a halt since President Yar’adua departed the shores of Nigeria in November, 2009. This is not a piece in which I want to use too many words because there is a lot of work to be done. I would like to encourage the Acting President to without further ado implement the recommended reforms of the Justice Uwais Electoral reform Committee. If this is the only thing Jonathan can do, he would have written his name in stone because Nigerians are and have for a long time being alienated from their government because those in power have not been those they voted into office. And as I have said previously on this blog, so long as people in power do not owe their loyalties to those over whom they rule, they will never rule with them in mind. Rather they would be in government to serve the purposes of the godfathers and cabals that put them in office.

And Jonathan has stated what that cabal can do. He can not pretend to be unaware that the power cabal that has stagnated Nigeria’s progress was actually against his ascension and fought tooth and nail to prevent it. While this was going on, Jonathan knows how they treated him-with disdain and contempt. If he should bother to ask himself why they treated him thus, he would realize that the reason is because they do not owe their rise to power to the electorate or to constitutionality, but to conspiracies and imposition and therefore a constitutional ascension to power (as was demanded by the Nigerian masses) was a threat to them.

Now having been a victim, Acting President Jonathan now stands in a unique position to make sure that he is the last victim by initiating the process of full and complete electoral reform based on the doctrine of one man one vote and that every vote must count. Understandably, Goodluck is part of a team that came about via ‘do or die elections’ but he must have seen what the principal beneficiary of the ‘do or die’ election-president Umaru Yar’adua- did to the one who executed the ‘do or die elections’ in his favour-ex president Obasanjo-. This should show Jonathan that even the one who shepherds a do or die election is eventually consumed by it. It is simply not worth it to trample on the people’s will. Acting President Goodluck Jonathan has been blessed by God, through very little effort of his own he has risen from an assistant director in OMPADEC in 1998 to Deputy Governor, Governor, Vice President and now President. Perhaps God is trying to tell him something!

Goodluck should take a cue from the late President Harry S. Truman who saw his miraculous ascension to office in April, 1945 as an opportunity to right the wrongs of the world. It would be recalled that Harry S Truman presided over the end of World War 2, halted the spread of Communism via the ‘Truman Doctrine of Containment’ and rebuilt a devastated Europe via the unprecedented ‘Marshall Plan’. Acting President Goodluck may very well want to take a cue from such a man who rose to power under circumstances similar to his to halt the trend of impunity associated with theft of elections and institute the ‘Uwais Electoral Reforms”. He may also want to take a cue from Truman and implement a Marshall Plan for the Niger Delta to compensate them for the years of injustice and thus once and for all halt the militancy that has been in that region ever since Isaac Adaka Boro left Unilag to take up arms in the swamps of the Niger Delta. If Acting President Goodluck Jonathan can do these two things, he would have written his name in gold and would have justified the favour that God has given him by miraculously promoting him even without any effort of his own.

Furthermore, Jonathan can like Truman preside over the end of conflicts and wars in Nigeria by reducing tension in the country. He should work with the National Assembly’s constitution Amendment Committee to fast track the work of  amending our constitution to completely eradicate the citizen/settler dichotomy. Every Nigerian born and resident in any place in Nigeria should be able to lay claim to that place as his place of origin. It is ridiculous to expect an Hausa man born and raised in Lagos to go back to the North to contest elective office. He should be able to do so where he resides and vice versa for an Igbo man born in Kano. Nigeria has retrogressed in being our brother’s keeper since the unfortunate civil war of 1967-1970. People forget that in pre independence Nigeria, Nnamdi Azikiwe won election in Ibadan or that Malam Umaru Altine was the first elected Mayor of Enugu or that Felix Okonkwo was a member of the Northern House of chiefs. Jonathan is in a privilege position to push the National Assembly to end this dichotomy so that we NEVER see the type of bloodshed we experienced in Jos last month.

Finally, it will bring down tension in the country and foster national reconciliation if Acting President Goodluck Jonathan can discontinue all politically motivated trials. People like Nasir El Rufai and Nuhu Ribadu should not be facing the obviously trumped up charges against them while someone like James Ibori parades Nigeria as a godfather. It simply is not right. Their trials and any trials initiated for political purposes should be discontinued and they should be allowed to return to Nigeria to participate in Nation Building. If Jonathan can find the political will to do this, he will find that Nigerians will also find a place in their hearts for him as they did for heroes like Murtala Mohammed.

Once again, God Bless Nigeria.

PU.

My Interview With The Vanguard

ABSENCE OF PRESIDENT YAR’ADUA : Why Nigeria is an unserious nation, by Pat Utomi

*Professor Pat Utomi.

* Says the enlightened world has forgotten about Nigeria
*Insists a clique is just holding Nigeria down

Professor Pat Utomi is a rare individual and many would agree. But he is also a concerned Nigerian. His shot at the presidency in 2007 was considered a fool’s errand in some quarters – a wasted effort – but the man believes and, therefore, insists that it was one wonderful experience which has touched and continues to touch many lives. How?  It is about changing the mind set of the leaders of tomorrow, making them realize that Nigeria can not get anywhere with the present template on which it is governed.

But Utomi, in this interview says he attempted once, to rally a group of young Nigerians in different fields of endeavour, and got the shock of his life.  He had called a meeting of some successful professionals and business men, while not leaving out the politicians too. And hear him:  “Half way through the meeting I discovered that I was in a lot of trouble because one of the governors in attendance just chipped in – it was supposed to be a joke but it also showed how the mind was working: “see as we full here no babes”. And I just said “Oh! God, it can’t be this bad”. “In any case, another meeting was scheduled for Benin and I said to myself that I was not going to be part of this babe business. (laughs)

“I didn’t show up at Benin and it was at Benin that the name Under 50 came in. Aliko and Donald then called me and I told them what my reservations were and they said it would not be like that again and another meeting was scheduled for Jos, Governor Joshua Dariye at that time was supposed to host it. “I quickly set to work, for three weeks, on all kinds of subject matter, writing position papers and all that and all that, preparing for this important meeting. “So, I went to Jos and everybody showed up including governors in their sixties, whether you were 60 or 20 years old people just showed up in Jos.

“It was seen as a political movement and after Jos, I just forgot about everything.” How fast dreams die in Nigeria. But he says he’s not about to give up. He speaks on the controversy generated by the President’s long absence from home and confesses that “You know I found the matter to be a very simple one in the beginning; very simple.  But it also just tells us that the people who are running Nigeria are just running Nigeria for themselves and not for us the people.  It is about the inordinate manifestation of a patrimonial state.  Even a semblance of their not being in control of power says to them that their opportunity of not being in charge is about to be eroded or possible reduced.  Look, I’ve worked in so many places in my life and I’ve not even ever thought of it like this.  I take it for granted that when I’m going off for just even one day, my deputy continues the job”
Excerpts:

By Jide Ajani, Deputy Editor & Anthonia Onwuka

As part of the group which met in Lagos to respond to the present situation of a president in absentia, what informed the meeting?  You spoke on behalf of the group?
I’ve been meeting with quite a number of people long ago on various issues that raise the consciousness of Nigerians and how to make the society a better place.  I have children and I would want them to live in a country that is far better than what we have an unfortunate situation where the elite class is not so interested any more; just one that wants to make a little money, send the children abroad for education and if possible never to come back to this country.

My children go to school away from here because of the conditions in Nigerian universities.  My son who finished in May is back in the country doing youth service.  Another one who finished in January will be back in the country by tomorrow and would also serve here. I believe in Nigeria.  You know I don’t have a room, not a house, a room, outside of Nigeria.  I would even like Mrs. Waziri to investigate me.

Somebody who came to this Lagos Business School, LBS, the wife of a former managing director of the Nigeria Ports Authority, wanted to know and was wondering about Opus Dei, and the connection it has with the LBS and how it was founded by members of Opus Dei got together to form the LBS and the women expressed amazement and said ‘ha! I thought it was the money you made from Volkswagen that you have brought back to the country to open LBS’ and I just laughed.

Pat Utomi.

You know, many years ago, just the week after I left Volkswagen, I couldn’t afford to buy a 17KVA generator, all the money I had I couldn’t afford it. But in Nigeria it is difficult for people to believe that when you’ve occupied such a position you wouldn’t have stashed away money.  Just after I left Volkswagen, I read in one of the soft sell magazines about Nigerians who must have stashed money abroad and I saw my name I laughed.  The truth then was that as at that time of the publication, all I had to my name anywhere in the world was just $2,800. In good conscience I am a committed Nigerian.  So my children deserve to live in a better society and that is why I fight so that we can create a better society.

Some people say you are a restless person?
Well, maybe.  I have this capacity to associate with the lowest of the lows and the mightiest of the mighty; and even the good, the bad and the ugly – it is just my nature. I belong to a number of groups and most of which I’ve founded and some I associate with fully.

Okay, back to this Yar’Adua business, how did you come about speaking for the group?
You know I found the matter to be a very simple one in the beginning; very simple. But it also just tells us that the people who are running Nigeria are running Nigeria for themselves and not for us the people.  It is about the inordinate manifestation of a patrimonial state.  Even a semblance of their not being in control of power says to them that their opportunity of not being in charge is about to be eroded or possibly reduced. Look, I’ve worked in so many places in my life and I’ve not even ever thought of it like this.  I take it for granted that when I’m going off for just even one day, my deputy continues the job.

So, when this thing started, I just didn’t think much of it as constituting any problem at all, I just thought it is a routine thing and I even said to some of my friends who were trying to organize things that this is nothing at all, until I really found out that these guys were just interested in holding on to power for as long as they wanted and nothing else really mattered to them any longer.

For them, it is just all about who would sign oil contracts, who would do this or that and it killed my spirit because this is a country that has failed to live up to something and now, this.  Instead of all of us being obsessed on how we can revive it, we are here messing up.

There was a time when the global survey began to write off Nigeria as a nation of consequence and at that time, things were not really this bad?
This global survey thing, when they said it some years ago that Nigeria was beginning to lose it and that Nigeria was on the path to being a failed state, instead, we started abusing the people.  The best thing we could have done or started doing to demonstrate that we were a serious people would have been to brace up, meet as a people and begin to find ways of getting out of that situation and avert it, but we just carried on as usual and abused them.

The next survey that they did, I was one of those invited to come and do the review in Sweden, to review the document, and by then they had discountenanced Nigeria as a country of any strategic influence or consequence.  They had already moved on and beyond the point of even thinking about Nigeria again.  They had adjusted to the fact that Nigeria was no more part of it, a country of no significance on the continent of Africa, they had adjusted to that and were moving on and yet, we are here where a few people are more concerned about who would sign oil contracts or who would approve this or that.  That is our own concern now.

That was then?
That was then; not now that we have this situation on our hands.

One of your engagements then was this ‘Under 50’ group that you attempted to midwife sometime ago.  Wouldn’t you, too, be accused of abandoning a project?  What became of it?
I started the whole bloody nonsense

Yes!  I know.  I think the first meeting took place in the residence of Alhaji Aliko Dangote?
Yes!  In Aliko Dangote’s house over there.

My question is, why did it fail and how does that failure fall into that paradigm of Nigerians not being serious enough to do any good, even for themselves?  I have an idea of what happened and my source told me, while preparing for this interview to get the real truth why it failed?
You know, that was for me the ultimate signal of our being unserious and the sign that we were in grave danger.

This was what happened some 10 years ago – at least things were not as terrible as they are now?
Yes!  This was then so you can imagine how bad things have become now. The idea wasn’t age as such because people tried to call it under 50. What happened was that I was attending a summit, it was called a Euro-Africa Summit; it was hosted in France by one of the country’s Prime Ministers (who is now late).  He showed personal concern for Africa so I was invited.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

There were so many African heads of state there; I was actually seated next to Blaise Campaore then and those meetings are usually confidential, this was some 12 years ago. There was a remark made by the former Ugandan Foreign Minister, Olara Otunnu, who said all this noise and excitement about South Africa; that he doesn’t know what they’re talking about.  He said once we get Nigeria right, we’ll get Africa right.  He spoke so passionately about the state of affairs in Nigeria in achieving the African dream.

He got me thinking that if a foreigner could talk so passionately about Nigeria, then we Nigerians owe it to ourselves to get things right.

When I got back to Nigeria, I started talking to a lot of people, after writing a list of bright Nigerian guys from different endeavours – from business, the likes of Fola Adeola, human rights, Olisa Agbakoba and so on and even from the military.

The idea was to get at least 72 Nigerians who were young and who could begin to re-engineer the process of nation building from their different spheres.  Even identify a few people in politics without holding office, and even politicians who were office holders, like Donald Duke, the late Waziri Mohammed, in business, Aliko Dangote.

So, I began to share my vision and goal with them one by one and we’ll all go for a retreat and we’ll invite Olara Otunnu to give the kick off talk, so that people will know what burden history will place on us as a people and nation.

So, one day I was in a meeting in one of those committees I was serving on when Waziri called me and said there was a Southern Governors’ Forum meeting going on in Akodo, in Lagos.  He said we could take advantage of that and meet with the governors; that Aliko had agreed that we could hold it in his house. I moved straight from the meeting venue, I didn’t go to my hotel room, I just moved straight to the airport and I landed in Lagos. So, we met in Aliko’s house and some of the governors were there – James Ibori, Donald Duke, Orji Kalu and a number of them were around.

Half way through the meeting I discovered that I was in a lot of trouble because one of the governors in attendance just chipped in – it was supposed to be a joke but it also showed how the mind was working: “see as we full here no babes”.

And I just said “Oh! God, it can’t be this bad”. In any case, another meeting was scheduled for Benin and I said to myself that I was not going to be part of this babe business. (laughs) I didn’t show up at Benin and it was at Benin that the name Under 50 came in.

Aliko and Donald then called me and I told them what my reservations were and they said it would not be like that again and another meeting was scheduled for Jos, Governor Joshua Dariye at that time was supposed to host it. I quickly set to work, for three weeks, on all kinds of subject matter, writing position papers and all that and all that, preparing for this important meeting.

So, I went to Jos and everybody showed up including governors in their 60s, whether you were 60 or 20 years old people just showed up in Jos. It was seen as a political movement and after Jos, I just forgot about everything.

Some people look at you and wonder what you’ve been up to since the 2007 elections which you contested on the platform of the ADC?
Of all the people who ran for office in 2007 and who are not in office, I probably would be the most active of all and I set out to do certain things, specific goals were set.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

Which type of goals did you go about setting for yourself?
The goal of institution building, the type of thing our country desperately needs at a time like this – the need to build institutions that would endure. Unfortunately for us in Nigeria, our institutions are very weak and this has had terrible impact and the Nigerian economy has been referred to as a recursive economy – two steps forward four steps backwards over the years.

The reason that happens is because the institutions of the market are very weak in Nigerian because when you start a reform and it looks like there is some progress, weak institutions lead you to begin to retrogress in no time.

In my view, although subconsciously, SAP was more or less sabotaged by weak institutions that did not allow then policy choices that were made to have long term sustainable fruitfulness. So, I committed myself to institution building in different ways.  At one of the dinners I held to try and mobilize young people, I said as we spoke that night, President Barrack Obama of the United States of America was airborne on his way to Ghana and not Nigeria and the reason is because our institutions are not strong enough and Nigeria believes in strong men over strong institution – it was an evidence of how our weak institutions have reduced Nigeria to nothing in the comity of nations.

The following morning in Ghana, Obama used almost exactly the same words I used in saying that Africa needs strong institutions and not strong men. And in the months immediately after the 2007 elections I started harping on this and doing specific things rather than just talk, I did specific things.  I tried to support the pro-democracy movement to strengthen its resolve but most importantly, part of my work that is often understated is the amount of time I spend with groups, youth groups all over the country, trying to fill them with words of inspiration on nation building and the need not to give up but on the need to transform this country – it is by the Grace of God and the gift of a particular kind of family that they have not been complaining loudly.  I’ve been all around from Kano to Yenegoa, continuously dealing with the issues of the day and the need to let them realize that what we have today can not get us anywhere at all.

As you move round and talk to this young people, there must be one common denominator you would have found?
Yes.  At times on the one hand you observe this sense of exhaustion in them, of frustration by the system, but there are a lot of them who do realize it too, that these people also know that the system as it is now can not get us anywhere.
One of the interesting feedbacks I’ve been getting is, for instance, from LEAP Africa, an NGO interested in building the young and building entrepreneurship; the NGO has been moving round the country too and when they get to some places and ask the youths who one of their role models is or what their idea of leadership mean, they mention my name and for me that gives me hope that gradually, we’re getting somewhere with what we’ve been trying to do.  Ndidi Onwuneli is the founder of LEAP Africa and she tells me that she wonders where such young people have come in contact with me.

I myself I’m not sure how that has happened but we must understand that public life is not about yourself or acquisition of wealth, it is about service to others.

For somebody like you, why has it been very difficult for you to find good space in the polity?  Even before you eventually got the presidential ticket of the African Democratic Party, ADC, you’d tried some other platforms but you could still not get good space.  Why is it that people like you don’t find that needed space to do good?
What has happened and I keep making this point to middle class people and professionals is that a lot of people have played the ostrich and we have all abandoned the need to do the right thing; we leave the space to the politicians and say let us go and mind our four wheel drives and mind our houses and let’s leave these funny characters who are in politics to keep doing their thing.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

There’s a story of a friend I always like to tell, a Liberian with whom I was in school in the United States, a friend of mind who became Liberia’s ambassador at some point, his name is Seyranius Fore, Fy, as we call him, rushed back to Liberia in 1979 or 1980.

When he became ambassador to Nigeria, I had just returned after my PhD but by that time Liberia was almost gone.  He used to tell me that ‘you Nigerians amaze me, you’re spending a lot of money and losing a lot of lives trying to save our people but it appears as if you people are not learning anything from what we’re going through’. He said in those days, they would ignore and refuse to pay attention to what the politicians and the soldiers were doing, that they were more interested in protecting their individual comfort zones until it got to a point when someone would just stop them on the way and dispossess them of the car and they would start thanking God that at least ‘we’re not dead’.

Then even the house, it was taken away and they found themselves in refugee camps, struggling for food with beggars and yet, they would thank God that as bad as it is, they are still alive.  He said we ought to move out of our comfort zones and be part of the process.

Societies that make progress, it is the middle class that populate the polity and engage in politics.  Obama was a constitutional lawyer, same goes for Bill Clinton. Ambassador Joe Keshi, Nigeria’s Counsel General in Georgia gave a remarkable example of a man who sought the governorship of a state but lost and by the following week he was right back at his desk working in his law chambers, within one week.

But these fellows who have nothing else to do, they just populate the polity and look for what to grab.  To them that’s what makes them big men, so we have this type of polarized state.

So, for me, part of what I’ve been doing is to work my talk, and not just talking alone.  Except we get involved in this thing we may not get anywhere. I mean, look at Nigeria of today, we no longer have intelligent discussions on matters again.  You get gullible people who respond to any populist comment by somebody in power and the next day people are in their comfort zones or bedrooms complaining about what that gullible fellow said but the truth of the matter is that that gullible fellow, people had always known him to be gullible and people are also aware that he couldn’t have made any other better statement than that and that this was going to be the consequence.

We have petrol queues now and people are saying ‘ha! We have petrol queues’. But I said in August last year that by this time we were going to have petrol queues, at least judging from how government was being run then. Until we can manage to create think-tanks and people who know and who have evidence are ready to discuss and engage people and chart the way forward.

In the last 20 years, Nigeria has not grown at all – we have grown at 0.00% in the last 20 years and this is a consequence of the types of choices that our central bank has been making and I’m not just talking about yesterday or recently, I’m talking about 20 years back.

CBN sabotaged SAP, not because they meant to but because the institution was not strong enough to make the right choices for us as a people and as a nation.  So, until we build institutions and grow them, we may never get there; that is the truth of the matter.

ABSENCE OF PRESIDENT YAR’ADUA : Why Nigeria is an unserious nation, by Pat Utomi

*Professor Pat Utomi.

* Says the enlightened world has forgotten about Nigeria
*Insists a clique is just holding Nigeria down

Professor Pat Utomi is a rare individual and many would agree. But he is also a concerned Nigerian. His shot at the presidency in 2007 was considered a fool’s errand in some quarters – a wasted effort – but the man believes and, therefore, insists that it was one wonderful experience which has touched and continues to touch many lives. How?  It is about changing the mind set of the leaders of tomorrow, making them realize that Nigeria can not get anywhere with the present template on which it is governed.

But Utomi, in this interview says he attempted once, to rally a group of young Nigerians in different fields of endeavour, and got the shock of his life.  He had called a meeting of some successful professionals and business men, while not leaving out the politicians too. And hear him:  “Half way through the meeting I discovered that I was in a lot of trouble because one of the governors in attendance just chipped in – it was supposed to be a joke but it also showed how the mind was working: “see as we full here no babes”. And I just said “Oh! God, it can’t be this bad”. “In any case, another meeting was scheduled for Benin and I said to myself that I was not going to be part of this babe business. (laughs)

“I didn’t show up at Benin and it was at Benin that the name Under 50 came in. Aliko and Donald then called me and I told them what my reservations were and they said it would not be like that again and another meeting was scheduled for Jos, Governor Joshua Dariye at that time was supposed to host it. “I quickly set to work, for three weeks, on all kinds of subject matter, writing position papers and all that and all that, preparing for this important meeting. “So, I went to Jos and everybody showed up including governors in their sixties, whether you were 60 or 20 years old people just showed up in Jos.

“It was seen as a political movement and after Jos, I just forgot about everything.” How fast dreams die in Nigeria. But he says he’s not about to give up. He speaks on the controversy generated by the President’s long absence from home and confesses that “You know I found the matter to be a very simple one in the beginning; very simple.  But it also just tells us that the people who are running Nigeria are just running Nigeria for themselves and not for us the people.  It is about the inordinate manifestation of a patrimonial state.  Even a semblance of their not being in control of power says to them that their opportunity of not being in charge is about to be eroded or possible reduced.  Look, I’ve worked in so many places in my life and I’ve not even ever thought of it like this.  I take it for granted that when I’m going off for just even one day, my deputy continues the job”
Excerpts:

By Jide Ajani, Deputy Editor & Anthonia Onwuka

As part of the group which met in Lagos to respond to the present situation of a president in absentia, what informed the meeting?  You spoke on behalf of the group?
I’ve been meeting with quite a number of people long ago on various issues that raise the consciousness of Nigerians and how to make the society a better place.  I have children and I would want them to live in a country that is far better than what we have an unfortunate situation where the elite class is not so interested any more; just one that wants to make a little money, send the children abroad for education and if possible never to come back to this country.

My children go to school away from here because of the conditions in Nigerian universities.  My son who finished in May is back in the country doing youth service.  Another one who finished in January will be back in the country by tomorrow and would also serve here. I believe in Nigeria.  You know I don’t have a room, not a house, a room, outside of Nigeria.  I would even like Mrs. Waziri to investigate me.

Somebody who came to this Lagos Business School, LBS, the wife of a former managing director of the Nigeria Ports Authority, wanted to know and was wondering about Opus Dei, and the connection it has with the LBS and how it was founded by members of Opus Dei got together to form the LBS and the women expressed amazement and said ‘ha! I thought it was the money you made from Volkswagen that you have brought back to the country to open LBS’ and I just laughed.

Pat Utomi.

You know, many years ago, just the week after I left Volkswagen, I couldn’t afford to buy a 17KVA generator, all the money I had I couldn’t afford it. But in Nigeria it is difficult for people to believe that when you’ve occupied such a position you wouldn’t have stashed away money.  Just after I left Volkswagen, I read in one of the soft sell magazines about Nigerians who must have stashed money abroad and I saw my name I laughed.  The truth then was that as at that time of the publication, all I had to my name anywhere in the world was just $2,800. In good conscience I am a committed Nigerian.  So my children deserve to live in a better society and that is why I fight so that we can create a better society.

Some people say you are a restless person?
Well, maybe.  I have this capacity to associate with the lowest of the lows and the mightiest of the mighty; and even the good, the bad and the ugly – it is just my nature. I belong to a number of groups and most of which I’ve founded and some I associate with fully.

Okay, back to this Yar’Adua business, how did you come about speaking for the group?
You know I found the matter to be a very simple one in the beginning; very simple. But it also just tells us that the people who are running Nigeria are running Nigeria for themselves and not for us the people.  It is about the inordinate manifestation of a patrimonial state.  Even a semblance of their not being in control of power says to them that their opportunity of not being in charge is about to be eroded or possibly reduced. Look, I’ve worked in so many places in my life and I’ve not even ever thought of it like this.  I take it for granted that when I’m going off for just even one day, my deputy continues the job.

So, when this thing started, I just didn’t think much of it as constituting any problem at all, I just thought it is a routine thing and I even said to some of my friends who were trying to organize things that this is nothing at all, until I really found out that these guys were just interested in holding on to power for as long as they wanted and nothing else really mattered to them any longer.

For them, it is just all about who would sign oil contracts, who would do this or that and it killed my spirit because this is a country that has failed to live up to something and now, this.  Instead of all of us being obsessed on how we can revive it, we are here messing up.

There was a time when the global survey began to write off Nigeria as a nation of consequence and at that time, things were not really this bad?
This global survey thing, when they said it some years ago that Nigeria was beginning to lose it and that Nigeria was on the path to being a failed state, instead, we started abusing the people.  The best thing we could have done or started doing to demonstrate that we were a serious people would have been to brace up, meet as a people and begin to find ways of getting out of that situation and avert it, but we just carried on as usual and abused them.

The next survey that they did, I was one of those invited to come and do the review in Sweden, to review the document, and by then they had discountenanced Nigeria as a country of any strategic influence or consequence.  They had already moved on and beyond the point of even thinking about Nigeria again.  They had adjusted to the fact that Nigeria was no more part of it, a country of no significance on the continent of Africa, they had adjusted to that and were moving on and yet, we are here where a few people are more concerned about who would sign oil contracts or who would approve this or that.  That is our own concern now.

That was then?
That was then; not now that we have this situation on our hands.

One of your engagements then was this ‘Under 50’ group that you attempted to midwife sometime ago.  Wouldn’t you, too, be accused of abandoning a project?  What became of it?
I started the whole bloody nonsense

Yes!  I know.  I think the first meeting took place in the residence of Alhaji Aliko Dangote?
Yes!  In Aliko Dangote’s house over there.

My question is, why did it fail and how does that failure fall into that paradigm of Nigerians not being serious enough to do any good, even for themselves?  I have an idea of what happened and my source told me, while preparing for this interview to get the real truth why it failed?
You know, that was for me the ultimate signal of our being unserious and the sign that we were in grave danger.

This was what happened some 10 years ago – at least things were not as terrible as they are now?
Yes!  This was then so you can imagine how bad things have become now. The idea wasn’t age as such because people tried to call it under 50. What happened was that I was attending a summit, it was called a Euro-Africa Summit; it was hosted in France by one of the country’s Prime Ministers (who is now late).  He showed personal concern for Africa so I was invited.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

There were so many African heads of state there; I was actually seated next to Blaise Campaore then and those meetings are usually confidential, this was some 12 years ago. There was a remark made by the former Ugandan Foreign Minister, Olara Otunnu, who said all this noise and excitement about South Africa; that he doesn’t know what they’re talking about.  He said once we get Nigeria right, we’ll get Africa right.  He spoke so passionately about the state of affairs in Nigeria in achieving the African dream.

He got me thinking that if a foreigner could talk so passionately about Nigeria, then we Nigerians owe it to ourselves to get things right.

When I got back to Nigeria, I started talking to a lot of people, after writing a list of bright Nigerian guys from different endeavours – from business, the likes of Fola Adeola, human rights, Olisa Agbakoba and so on and even from the military.

The idea was to get at least 72 Nigerians who were young and who could begin to re-engineer the process of nation building from their different spheres.  Even identify a few people in politics without holding office, and even politicians who were office holders, like Donald Duke, the late Waziri Mohammed, in business, Aliko Dangote.

So, I began to share my vision and goal with them one by one and we’ll all go for a retreat and we’ll invite Olara Otunnu to give the kick off talk, so that people will know what burden history will place on us as a people and nation.

So, one day I was in a meeting in one of those committees I was serving on when Waziri called me and said there was a Southern Governors’ Forum meeting going on in Akodo, in Lagos.  He said we could take advantage of that and meet with the governors; that Aliko had agreed that we could hold it in his house. I moved straight from the meeting venue, I didn’t go to my hotel room, I just moved straight to the airport and I landed in Lagos. So, we met in Aliko’s house and some of the governors were there – James Ibori, Donald Duke, Orji Kalu and a number of them were around.

Half way through the meeting I discovered that I was in a lot of trouble because one of the governors in attendance just chipped in – it was supposed to be a joke but it also showed how the mind was working: “see as we full here no babes”.

And I just said “Oh! God, it can’t be this bad”. In any case, another meeting was scheduled for Benin and I said to myself that I was not going to be part of this babe business. (laughs) I didn’t show up at Benin and it was at Benin that the name Under 50 came in.

Aliko and Donald then called me and I told them what my reservations were and they said it would not be like that again and another meeting was scheduled for Jos, Governor Joshua Dariye at that time was supposed to host it. I quickly set to work, for three weeks, on all kinds of subject matter, writing position papers and all that and all that, preparing for this important meeting.

So, I went to Jos and everybody showed up including governors in their 60s, whether you were 60 or 20 years old people just showed up in Jos. It was seen as a political movement and after Jos, I just forgot about everything.

Some people look at you and wonder what you’ve been up to since the 2007 elections which you contested on the platform of the ADC?
Of all the people who ran for office in 2007 and who are not in office, I probably would be the most active of all and I set out to do certain things, specific goals were set.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

Which type of goals did you go about setting for yourself?
The goal of institution building, the type of thing our country desperately needs at a time like this – the need to build institutions that would endure. Unfortunately for us in Nigeria, our institutions are very weak and this has had terrible impact and the Nigerian economy has been referred to as a recursive economy – two steps forward four steps backwards over the years.

The reason that happens is because the institutions of the market are very weak in Nigerian because when you start a reform and it looks like there is some progress, weak institutions lead you to begin to retrogress in no time.

In my view, although subconsciously, SAP was more or less sabotaged by weak institutions that did not allow then policy choices that were made to have long term sustainable fruitfulness. So, I committed myself to institution building in different ways.  At one of the dinners I held to try and mobilize young people, I said as we spoke that night, President Barrack Obama of the United States of America was airborne on his way to Ghana and not Nigeria and the reason is because our institutions are not strong enough and Nigeria believes in strong men over strong institution – it was an evidence of how our weak institutions have reduced Nigeria to nothing in the comity of nations.

The following morning in Ghana, Obama used almost exactly the same words I used in saying that Africa needs strong institutions and not strong men. And in the months immediately after the 2007 elections I started harping on this and doing specific things rather than just talk, I did specific things.  I tried to support the pro-democracy movement to strengthen its resolve but most importantly, part of my work that is often understated is the amount of time I spend with groups, youth groups all over the country, trying to fill them with words of inspiration on nation building and the need not to give up but on the need to transform this country – it is by the Grace of God and the gift of a particular kind of family that they have not been complaining loudly.  I’ve been all around from Kano to Yenegoa, continuously dealing with the issues of the day and the need to let them realize that what we have today can not get us anywhere at all.

As you move round and talk to this young people, there must be one common denominator you would have found?
Yes.  At times on the one hand you observe this sense of exhaustion in them, of frustration by the system, but there are a lot of them who do realize it too, that these people also know that the system as it is now can not get us anywhere.
One of the interesting feedbacks I’ve been getting is, for instance, from LEAP Africa, an NGO interested in building the young and building entrepreneurship; the NGO has been moving round the country too and when they get to some places and ask the youths who one of their role models is or what their idea of leadership mean, they mention my name and for me that gives me hope that gradually, we’re getting somewhere with what we’ve been trying to do.  Ndidi Onwuneli is the founder of LEAP Africa and she tells me that she wonders where such young people have come in contact with me.

I myself I’m not sure how that has happened but we must understand that public life is not about yourself or acquisition of wealth, it is about service to others.

For somebody like you, why has it been very difficult for you to find good space in the polity?  Even before you eventually got the presidential ticket of the African Democratic Party, ADC, you’d tried some other platforms but you could still not get good space.  Why is it that people like you don’t find that needed space to do good?
What has happened and I keep making this point to middle class people and professionals is that a lot of people have played the ostrich and we have all abandoned the need to do the right thing; we leave the space to the politicians and say let us go and mind our four wheel drives and mind our houses and let’s leave these funny characters who are in politics to keep doing their thing.

*Professor Pat Utomi.

There’s a story of a friend I always like to tell, a Liberian with whom I was in school in the United States, a friend of mind who became Liberia’s ambassador at some point, his name is Seyranius Fore, Fy, as we call him, rushed back to Liberia in 1979 or 1980.

When he became ambassador to Nigeria, I had just returned after my PhD but by that time Liberia was almost gone.  He used to tell me that ‘you Nigerians amaze me, you’re spending a lot of money and losing a lot of lives trying to save our people but it appears as if you people are not learning anything from what we’re going through’. He said in those days, they would ignore and refuse to pay attention to what the politicians and the soldiers were doing, that they were more interested in protecting their individual comfort zones until it got to a point when someone would just stop them on the way and dispossess them of the car and they would start thanking God that at least ‘we’re not dead’.

Then even the house, it was taken away and they found themselves in refugee camps, struggling for food with beggars and yet, they would thank God that as bad as it is, they are still alive.  He said we ought to move out of our comfort zones and be part of the process.

Societies that make progress, it is the middle class that populate the polity and engage in politics.  Obama was a constitutional lawyer, same goes for Bill Clinton. Ambassador Joe Keshi, Nigeria’s Counsel General in Georgia gave a remarkable example of a man who sought the governorship of a state but lost and by the following week he was right back at his desk working in his law chambers, within one week.

But these fellows who have nothing else to do, they just populate the polity and look for what to grab.  To them that’s what makes them big men, so we have this type of polarized state.

So, for me, part of what I’ve been doing is to work my talk, and not just talking alone.  Except we get involved in this thing we may not get anywhere. I mean, look at Nigeria of today, we no longer have intelligent discussions on matters again.  You get gullible people who respond to any populist comment by somebody in power and the next day people are in their comfort zones or bedrooms complaining about what that gullible fellow said but the truth of the matter is that that gullible fellow, people had always known him to be gullible and people are also aware that he couldn’t have made any other better statement than that and that this was going to be the consequence.

We have petrol queues now and people are saying ‘ha! We have petrol queues’. But I said in August last year that by this time we were going to have petrol queues, at least judging from how government was being run then. Until we can manage to create think-tanks and people who know and who have evidence are ready to discuss and engage people and chart the way forward.

In the last 20 years, Nigeria has not grown at all – we have grown at 0.00% in the last 20 years and this is a consequence of the types of choices that our central bank has been making and I’m not just talking about yesterday or recently, I’m talking about 20 years back.

CBN sabotaged SAP, not because they meant to but because the institution was not strong enough to make the right choices for us as a people and as a nation.  So, until we build institutions and grow them, we may never get there; that is the truth of the matter.

Do you see hope in this country?

Yes!  If there’s no hope then you’re dead

The Difference Between Leadership and Management

The true test of leadership is influence!

The true test of leadership is influence!

When I wrote the piece below extolling the leadership qualities of Dora Akunyili in June of last year, I was severely attacked by some pundits who felt Dora had sold out.  A lot of folks emailed me expressing disappointment with my words. However, I remember responding back that you cant really judge a person’s leadership ability until you have seen them under pressure. Where there is a crisis, most people tend to take the path of least resistance. In the Federal Executive Council (or Exxecutive Council of the Federation) that path had been to live in denial and act as if President Yar’adua was in control when in fact there was no one in control and Nigeria was/is in a free fall. It took a woman, Dora Akunyili, to remember her oath of office as a minister who swore allegiance to Nigeria and not to an individual to appeal to the council’s better judgment. Today, Dora asked  the Council to act in the best interest of Nigeria and seek a vacation letter from President Yar’adua in order for the Vice President to effectively and constitutionally temporarily take over as acting president and halt the drfit to anarchy staring us in the face. Yes the council turned down her request, but it is on record that she spoke the truth.

I now call on Dora to go even further and resign from the FEC. Dora has shown honour and is now a strange bed fellows to people without honour and who have placed loyalty to an individual over loyalty to their country. Kudos Dora.

Please find below the article I wrote in June last year and with the benefit of recent events tryand appreciate why I made the call on Dora way back in June.

 

I was in Abuja today, and drove by the offices of NAFDAC and the EFCC and I was again struck by the dramatic change in the activities of these two national institution from what obtained just two years ago. What has happened at these two agencies is a very good example of the difference between Leadership and Management. A lot of people think that these two things are the same, but they are actually quite different. Leadership refers to the proactive siezing of new opportunities and breaking new bounds. It involves a decision to make a way where there was no way and charting a new course. It also involves the setting up of an efficient structure and a hierarchy that hitherto did not exist.  leaders deliver results and the true test of leadership is influence-a true leader has influence and commands respect. Finally, a leader does not derive his influence because of his office, but because of what he/she has done with the office!  Management on the other hand refers to keeping watch over structures and hierarchy that have been created and expanded by some other person. It is possible that a good manager may expand the teritory won by a leader, but more than likely a manager will keep watch and maintain what he/she met. Finally many managers deliver activity rather than results and while a good manager may get respect, an average manager usually has to demand respect rather than command it. Remember it is not the title that makes a person a leader. You may be a manager of a bank by official title, but by conduct you are a leader, while you may be the head of an organization, but by conduct be a manager!

Dora Akinyuli  was a leader at  NAFDAC. I daresay that few had heard of NAFDAC before she came in, but the truth is that it did exist before her, but was a toothless bulldog. It was just a place where civil servants did nothing and collected salaries at the end of the month. And then came Dora. Having lost her own diabetic sister to fake drugs in 1988, Dora infused life into NAFDAC and suddenly Nigerians were so sensitized against fake drugs that the merchants of death dealing in that trade began to plot her death.  Dora escaped death by the whiskers in an assassination because her NAFDAC was efficient. She dared to shut down the bakery of a very influential ex first lady, and flexed muscles with the late Lamidi Adedibu in Ibadan and came out on top. She was acknowledged by Time magazine in a full spread as one of the most influential people in the world. But what do we have now? NAFDAC has come under the influence of a manager and has returned to being a toothless bulldog. When was the last time you heard about NAFDAC in the news? If you heard of it then it must be because of a courtesy call on its office not because of any act of putting fake drugs merchant to flight.

Similarly, the EFCC under Malam Ribadu was a different EFCC. Say what you want about him, but Nuhu Ribadu was a leader. A man who could go after the richest ex-military ruler, a man who arrested, cinvicted and jailed his Inspector General of Police, who arrested powerful ex-governors and reduced them to tears in court, who influenced the choice of the previous administration in choosing their successors is a very powerful leader. Ribadu never gave excuses for an inability to prosecute corruption, he knew it was a cancer that has reduced Nigeria to a laughing stock and impeded her progress and he did something about it. Due to his efforts, Nigeria which was blacklisted by the Finacial Action Task Force before he came on board was delisted and we improved significantly on the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index. There was also a robust cooperation between the EFCC under Ribadu and the Metropolitian police of London, The FBI and other world law enforcement bodies. Interestingly on the same that his predecessor and the current  president granted interviews severely criticizing him, Ribadu was invited by no less a body than the U.S congress to educate it on the issue of 3rd world corruption. It just goes to show you that you can not keep a good man down!

While it is fashionable for some to accuse Ribadu of selective prosecution, none have been able to say that he arrested innocent people. We should not allow mental laziness to beguile us. Corruption has reached desperate heights in Nigeria and desperate illnesses require desperate surgeries!

For all the current administration’s efforts to demonize Ribadu, they can not point to any achievement of theirs in the anti corruption battle except an empty call for the adherence to the ‘rule of law’. The rule of law actually means that the law guides you not ties you. Within the scope of the law, a leader can make an impact in the anti corruption battle if there is the will.

In the final analysis, an unbiased observer may come to the conclusion that since any reasonable man intends the consequences of his actions,  the actions of the current leadership (managers) of the EFCC and the current administration points to the conclusion that they intend to tone down the anti corruption war. For as Sherlock Holmes would say, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth. How else can you explain that ex-governors who were arrested and charged to court by Ribadu and whose cases are still being ‘managed’ in court by the current EFCC are regular visitors to our presidential villa!

I am a known critic of former president Obasanjo, but I believe in giving credit where credit is due. In the last administration, the institutions that projected the power and efficiency of government especially in the more effective second term of Obasanjo where the EFCC and NAFDAC and key ministers like Nasir El’rufai and ‘madam due process’ Oby Ezekwesili as well as Ngozi Okonjo Iweala.  Obasanjo deserves credit for the political support he gave his economic team that enabled them to show leadership and achieve amongst other things the exit of Nigeria from the Paris club of debtors by paying up the nations debt (which is again piling up) and building a sizeable foreign reserve (although some of  it could have been spent on much needed infrastructure). Also the former  president showed some foresight in setting up the excess crude account which the current president condemned when he came in, but which has come in handy particularly with the sharp drop in oil revenue. 

It has also become a favourite past time of this administration to cast aspersion on the person of Malam Nasir El’rufai. However if you had visited the FCT Abuja when Nasir held sway and pay a visit today the difference is very clear. Nasir showed leadership by running Abuja in a most business like manner. He cleaned up land registration by establishing the Abuja Geographic Information Service (AGIS) and restored a lot of the city’s original master plan and stepped on very powerful toes. He kept the city clean and beautified it, every morning you could actually see workers cleaning up the city. He invested heavily in infrastructure. He showed leadership by beginning with the end in mind and remained focused even when powerful forces agitated against him. But visit Abuja today and see what ‘managers’ have done. What has happened in the intervening years since El’rufai left office is a sharp decline in the physical appearance of Abuja.

This administration should consider the damage it has done and continues to do to the psyche of Nigerian youths when it’s principal officer condemn the contributions of Nigerians who exhibited leadership in their performance of national assignments. I want to seize this opportunity to celebrate Nuhu Ribadu, Malam Nasir El’rufai, Oby Ezekwesili, Ngozi Okonjo Iweala and Bode Agusto. To them I say this-remember that no matter how far falsehood has travelled, it must eventually be overtaken by truth. 

 

PU!

HEALTH AND THE WEALTH OF NATIONS AND THE CHALLENGE OF NATION BUILDING

Chairman of Council and Pro Chancellor

Of the University of Lagos

Vice – Chancellor

Provost of the College of Medicine

And Esteem Faculty of College

Very Distinguished Guests

Ladies and Gentlemen.

HEALTH AND THE WEALTH OF NATIONS AND THE CHALLENGE OF NATION BUILDING

I must begin with thanking the organizing Committee of the Professor Felix Dosekun Lecture Series, first for the thoroughness of their effort and then for finding me worthy to join the fraternity of those who have delivered this lecture in honour of an outstanding intellectual and statesman.

I do also want to place on record my appreciation of the College of Medicine for instituting this lecture series to immortalize a great pioneer, intellectual and statesman. I am actively engaged in trying to get people to pause and reflect on what constitutes a meaningful life in the midst of an extant culture of “My Mercedes is bigger than yours” and honour such as this does more to validate a meaningful life than the preaching of a thousand Pastors. With this lecture the College confers immortality on Professor Dosekun.

In a 1991 interview I had said that man’s purpose was the pursuit of immortality. I acknowledged two forms, material immortality – to live in the consciousness of men long after flesh has taken its place as dust like Shakespeare and Einstein do, and spiritual immortality, which for people of faith, is to see God face to face. Most wise people, I suggested, seek both. This lecture certainly helps bring this to Professor Dosekun long after the biggest money bags of his time have faded from even the memories of relatives. We need such to encourage people to seek the meaningful life so l am very pleased that the College has turned to such to honour its best.

Let me also note how pleased I feel that I am the first FOD lecture speaker from outside the discipline of Medicine, and I understand, the first indeed, not to have sat in a class under the spell of this man of knowledge and practice.

I am also pleased that this lecture series is being now used, in addition to remembering a hero passed, to endow scholarships and other purpose of enhanced academic pursuit in his area. I enjoyed the privilege of endowing prices for students in Economics for several years at the Akoka Campus and was pleased to hear that the former Vice – Chancellor Prof Oye Ibidapo – Obe who handed out some of the prizes and the late Deen of Faculty Prof. C. S. Momoh spoke generously of that enterprise. I do hope my friends who are here today try to do me one better at the College of Medicine.

Let me return to the core subject of the day, health care and policy to ensure effective delivery of health care in Nigeria. A few years ago, I was invited to the Teaching Hospital of Bisi Onabanjo University in Shagamu. As speaker, I was preceded by a Professor from the College of Medicine here at the University of Lagos. He had left after the morning session but his comments continued to resonate when I arrived and was called up to the podium. He was said to have described the healthcare system in Nigeria as a “man-made” disaster. Drawing from this I wonder if images of the struggle against a natural disaster, the earthquake in Haiti would be appropriate metaphor for the state of health policy implementation in Nigeria.

If you consider the following you may come to the conclusion that we are dealing with a man-made disaster with worse consequences than Haiti is suffering from the flattening of Port au Prince by the Earthquake of January 2010.

On one evening a few weeks before the earthquake an executive I know was evacuating his mother – in- law to South Africa for a heart ailment. Of his own came the volunteering of the rather scandalous comment that four other air ambulance he knew of left Nigeria that day. The calculations we got that one month cost of these air ambulance services for the benefit of a few, could provide for a quality midsize hospital. I remarked that it was an irony that as we had that discussion the President of Nigeria was lying in a Saudi hospital an irony made more painful by the fact that a few years ago most Saudi hospitals were staffed by doctors from LUTH and other hospitals in Nigeria.

Why does the effect of collapse of health care be compare with the horrific nature of the Haiti disaster. Atrocious health care breeds poverty which is a bigger mass killer than earthquake and Tsunamis. Indeed human progress in these times is predicated significantly on human capital. There are two sides to human capital, education and health care. Until we can build up skills and the capacity to produce and have the skilled well enough to apply their talent and knowledge to development, society stagnates. The consequent deprivation can leave more widespread harm to human beings than the occasional natural disaster causes.

In my work I have offered a framework for understanding economic growth. Among the six critical sets of interdependent variables that result in growth is human capital. The others, Policy Choice, Institutions, Entrepreneurship, Culture, and Leadership share with Human Capital the vital transmission of human progress. In my 2006 book, “WHY NATION’S ARE POOR” I continue the tradition began in my 1998 book: “MANAGING UNCERTIAINTY: COMPETITION AND STRATEGY IN EMERGYING ECONOMIES” regarding the key role of institutions in advancing the goals of development. Sadly, institutions of health care provision have been subject to levels of neglect that made them the subject of coup day speeches in which hospitals were said to have declined to mere “Consulting Clinics”. They have come so far down that there is hardly enough power supply for basic services to be assured at Centres of Excellence such as our leading Teaching hospitals and can therefore be rightly described as a man made disaster.

If Nigeria is to be renewed and we are to go from the country of great promise that became paradise deferred but now on the track to paradise reclaimed we need some new sets of basic ideas that are implementable but fresh and refreshingly different. In the following discussion l offer a few of these ideas.

I do hope my comments will serve both as a source of productive impetus to debate, as well as a signal for policymakers whether in or outside office to encourage. Our public space is unfortunately benefit of quality discussion of such importance. To that end, I will make comments in a number of capacities, whose crossover points may not necessarily be immediately apparent. I will comment as a private citizen, self-interested personal and policy stakeholder, political leader, and finally, as a believer in the idea that entrepreneurial ideas, given sufficient heft by the appropriate business environment, can be a critical partner in solving many a seemingly difficult public policy question.

Given that context, now I believe it is best to start by stating up front that I am in full agreement with the broad theme recently emerging from the leadership of the Federal Ministry of Health. That message is that Nigeria’s healthcare industry is at a cross roads, and that the record of achievement from an outcomes perspective is poor. Thus, I cannot disagree with the Federal Government’s read of the situation. To that end, I will not inundate you with statistics such as how many Nigerians die every year from malaria. We all know the dimensions of the problem, though a number of you might be further jolted should we review the data in its bitter fullness. The Roll back Malaria Summit was one of the first health sector initiatives of the new Civilian Administration in 1999 because the Harvard Professor Jeffery Sach, author of the End of Poverty was on a crusade about how Malaria slows down economic growth in African. That influence remains in the concerns espoused by the Osotimen in Ministry of Health.

Where I part ways with the Honorable Federal Minister, however, is on how to solve the health challenge. It is my view that the current Yar’adua administration is approach is flawed in that it focuses on symptoms of the healthcare challenge, rather than structurally attacking the challenge. That policy logic is a continuation of the failure under the Obasanjo Administration. An illustration of that is the National Malaria control strategy which in my judgment overemphasizes the use of treated bed nets and donor funding, as opposed to seeking ways to use technology to eradicate the breeding grounds of the anopheles mosquito and the mosquito through a radical program of spraying as successfully deployed in South Africa in the past decade. The use of treated bed nets is a palliative that cannot substitute for a real end game strategy in malaria.

I made this point while speaking at a retreat for the Lagos State Ministry of the Environment two weeks ago. The old sanitary inspector role, the wole – wole factor remains the key. Involving the community in ensuring gutters are erected and drains flow is key.

I also hear platitudes about primary health care that is not supported by any clear strategy. As a young man courting a student here in Idi Araba 27 years ago, I recall that primary health care was the buzz of the neighbourhood, thanks to Professor Olukoye Ransome-Kuti. How much has the Federal Ministry of Health upheld the legacy of that former health Minister who was so influential as leading faculty on this campus back in those days?

Thus, today, I want to speak broadly about the healthcare system in Nigeria as opposed to a single therapeutic category or intervention, and my vision for transforming it. I believe that any change agenda in the healthcare space needs to be framed and executed on 2 dimensions: an efficiency and a strategic dimension.

Dimension 1: Pursue Efficiency Improvements to Reduce Cost per User

First, efficiency improvements are necessary to improve the productivity of current assets in the system ranging from skilled medical personnel to MRI machines to inventory of medication. Today, a great deal of waste exists in the system. It is pertinent to ask what percentage of the proposed US$1 billion 2010 federal healthcare budget will actually be spent on improving outcomes. What percentage of the budgets in the past 3, 5 and 10 years was actually spent improving the quality of patient lives for example, or investing in expanding the capability of medical personnel to heal? Was 25% wasted? It is hard to determine because we cannot analyze what we do not measure.

Today, waste comes from a variety of sources ranging from poor scheduling of physicians and pharmacists to poor management of patient records, leading to more benign situations in which the time spent achieving a specified patient outcome is materially higher than it should be. In the worst case, waste and inefficiency have led directly to the death of patients and the attendant destruction of family dreams and aspirations. It is important to underline that waste can also come from medical personnel and resources sitting idle during a strike, and as you all know, we seem to live constantly under the threat of a strike.

As professionals and stakeholders, our goal from an efficiency improvement view is to reduce such waste, and therefore, improve the output of the overall health system. That output can be measured in terms of absolute output e.g. number of patients successfully treated per physician, number of patients per physician man hour, or in terms of quality. In the latter category, we can track levels of patient satisfaction, with the goal being to do more at a lower price point each year i.e. boost overall productivity of the heath system. The overall message nonetheless, is that as a broad logic, we should aim to do more with the little we have. Increasing the productivity of labor, capital and technology assets is a necessity in order to systematically engineer improvements in patient lives.

Dimension 2: Develop and Execute a Strategy That Drives Change

In the longer term, what strategic initiatives will Nigeria need to pursue in order to change its healthcare system? Or put differently, what does Nigeria need to do in order to deliver a competitive healthcare system to her citizens? In my opinion, there are 4 critical strategic themes or organizing principles Nigeria needs to pursue in the coming decade. These are:

1. improving access to healthcare by expanding the healthcare infrastructure in the country

2. changing the funding mix and economics of healthcare by recognizing that a healthy society confers both private and public benefit

3. expanding the pool of healthcare personnel at the skilled and semi-skilled level

4. nurturing and creating a culture of innovation in all aspects of healthcare

Strategic Theme 1: Improve Access to Healthcare

We should work to improve access to healthcare to all our citizens. There are a number of dimensions to improving access. This includes access to primary, specialist and support medical staff. It also includes access to hospital facilities and support equipment on a timely basis. There are a variety of ways in which we can measure access levels and the quality of such access e.g. density of medical services per square kilometer, or distance traveled to reach a physician, or time between arrival and attendance in an emergency room.

With an aspiration to increase the density of medical staff, facilities and equipment, broadly defined on a per patient basis, we can now focus public policy discourse on how to achieve that. For example, the current policy with respect to the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) is designed to improve access for employees in the formal labor markets to healthcare, even though the capitation levels effectively work against access expansion. The recently announced Federal policy of sending physicians to the rural areas is also supposed to improve access to doctors by village communities.

My view is that we have to use a portfolio of incentives and flexible structures to improve access. From tax credits for builders of hospitals to innovation grants to physicians practices who create new treatment protocols to reviving the mobile medical services networks to allowing supermarkets such as Shoprite to place mini-clinics in their stores, we must be open minded about how we extend care and at what price point. Our goal is to keep per patient costs as low as possible and on a steady decline pathway after initial rise to reflect new capital investments, while ensuring that service is broadly available.

That may lead to a situation in which, should I find myself in government again, I would argue for loosening some of the cost restrictions and capitations in the NHIS regulation. We have to make healthcare delivery both financial attractive to certain types of investors, as well as affordable to patients. We should also discuss ways in which macroeconomic policy that reduces the cost of capital due to a shift in long term inflation expectations can spur an expansion in investor willing to invest in the healthcare sector from hospitals to MRI centers to pharmacies.

Strategic Theme 2: Change the Funding Mix

Healthcare is a good with both private and public benefits. A healthy work force benefits the individual as well as society at large. To that extent, we all have a clear stake in transforming the funding of healthcare. Today, what we have is a weak system of funding. At one end are informal sector works such as mechanics enrolled in subsidized health insurance programs, or with no coverage at all. We estimate that about 80 million Nigerians are in this category. At the other end are private employees of formal sector companies who can afford to pay for the services of private networks such as CRI/UNIC and Hygeia. In between are public servants who rely on the new HMO system as well as public and private hospitals. These latter groups make up another 50 - 60 million citizens. What is clear is that the majority of Nigerian’s are not happy about their options and want a policy that comprehensively redesigns the funding and use of healthcare system.

It is my view that the NHIS system regulations need to be revisited in order to spur investment; current cost caps are not working i.e. we cannot ration our way out of the problem. A revised policy whether housed in the NHIS system or another system should seek to create a public health insurance option that exists side by side with competitive private options, with health insurance liberated from employer focused plans. The individual should be able to buy insurance at a competitive price including for pre-existing conditions, with the Federal Government providing a backstop funding support especially for catastrophic cases. That way, the general risk pool is not distorted and insurance costs will remain competitively priced for the majority of Nigerian citizens. I anticipate that as policy and the enabling law is rethought, new financing initiatives will emerge that seek to leverage a broad balance of private capital and focused public funding to make sure Nigeria’s 140 million citizens are covered.

I have on previous occasions proposed a community-based cooperative society health insurance scheme that can broaden access to the poorest of the poor at the bottom of the pyramid on a care for profit basis. What it takes is thinking out of the box like most bottoms of the pyramid schemes

Strategic Theme 3: Expanding Healthcare Personnel

To create broad based access for all citizens in rural and urban areas, it is critical that we develop a rich portfolio of clinics, hospitals, specialized health centers and laboratory services. Achieving that will require a revision of certain existing regulations related to the establishment of hospitals, pharmacies and specialized support services.

We believe that the rules will need to be rewritten to allow all classes of medical and support personnel to maintain within clear ethical guidelines, private practices and offices. Doctors and laboratory technicians, for example will be allowed to maintain their own businesses and practices in addition to their current day jobs as physicians at a teaching hospital. The key word in all of this is incentives. We need to use a new system of incentives to align private profit and public good, while more efficiently managing risk and reward tradeoffs.

It is also important that the thousands of Nigerian healthcare professionals who have left the country return. Even if we are successful in attracting only 25% of the broad pool of medical personnel who left since 1985, the impact would be material for Nigeria. I anticipate that such personnel will return with some capital as well as their wealth of world class experience and insight, and equally as important, relationship networks. That should lead to a blossoming of medical personnel access across the republic. I anticipate that as proposed changes in healthcare financing, insurance and support for entrepreneurial innovation occurs in parallel, access whether through traditional one-to-one visits, or new telemedicine platforms, will improve.

Finally, in parallel, we should review the pre-existing sector reviews and recommendations regarding the training of new healthcare personnel from lab workers to pharmacists to radiologists to surgeons and nurses. Many a federal committee has provided an expert view of the changes and reforms required, but little in the way of implementation has occurred. I recommend we review such counsel with an eye to amending as appropriate given today’s context and the need to use more entrepreneurial incentive mechanism to shift behavior. In addition, it is critical that we create new forecasts of our need for personnel, and redirect public and private funds to prepare for such a future. I commend the Universities Commission for its stance on boosting private university licensing; such a mindset should be more broadly followed as the population requiring care is likely to further expand in the next 20 years.

Strategic Theme 4: Building a Culture of Innovation

Beyond the interventions to solve the basic access, payment and network issues lie the longer term, and ultimately, less structured realm of innovation. It is important to understand that innovation driven by both basic and clever research is what lies at the heart of the global healthcare system.

An initial basic innovation I believe Nigeria needs is creation of electronic patient records and treatment management system. Such records are in many respects an efficiency gain, but given our context may be treated as an innovation. The records should be in a secure database that authorized physicians and other healthcare workers can have access to. Combined with a regulatory ruling requiring only prescriptions for certain categories of medication for example, patient safety and well being will be enhanced irrespective of the patient’s location in Nigeria. Creating the records will also give Nigeria better access to health intelligence as well as create the data to drive innovations in patient management e.g. wellness programs.

In the medium to longer term, our focus should be on encouraging the types of innovation that will create jobs and wealth in Nigeria. A review of most global patent databases show that Nigeria is not considered an innovative nation. The culture of R&D designed to advance the frontiers of knowledge, and create new wealth is sorely lacking. Or where such R&D exists, such as we often find in long forgotten federal institutes and labs, it is simply ignored by the government, nor is it backed by venture capital due to a broad environment that has failed to link ideas and commercialization in our institutions of higher learning. We now need to urgently inspire a generation of scientists and risk takers to once more try to break the code on sickle cell disease, as well as stake their claim in gene based therapies.

We also need to enthusiastically work to own the R&D frontiers on a range of tropical ailments, as well as the process of disease management and patient treatment from computerized patient databases to social support and counseling networks. A critical element of our shared future is the ability to deploy existing knowledge as well as create new knowledge. Much of the diseases and concerns Nigerians have such as cholera, malaria, river blindness etc do not receive sufficient attention. We need to transform our funding of such so called orphan diseases, and profit as a society materially and spiritually from such work.

By championing innovation and the network of innovators whether in small research labs and corporations, or giant medical conglomerates, Nigeria will be helping invent a future for some of her most talented citizen’s, as well as simply keep them alive! I propose that the Federal Government, through a risk based funding system that aligns the national research objectives with the capabilities of Nigerian institutions, should start offering “Health Challenge Grants.” These should be competitive grants that cover both the needs for capital equipment and funding of personnel on specific diseases.

It is important that such funds also be available to research-focused healthcare start-ups and universities as venture funding for well-designed initiatives to commercialize research. American universities from Stanford to Georgia Tech to Chicago have done an excellent job of licensing technology or spinning them off; we should allow Nigerian researchers to have part ownership in their own inventions so that risk and reward are appropriately aligned, with specialized university technology development corporations focused on licensing these technologies, or professors allowed to go and start new ventures to bring new drugs and technologies to market.

I propose the need for a new and creative approach to commercialization of such knowledge. The Federal government should grant the researcher and host university or corporation a right to use the findings of the research for example in drug creation on an exclusive basis for 20 years, provided clear guidelines on investment into commercialization are met. In return, the Federal government will have an irrevocable right to 10%-20% of the profits generated from the sales of any drugs or non-drug innovation emerging from such labs e.g. a new database system for managing patient records using mobile phone systems. Only by unleashing the energies of Nigeria’s most talented and diligent can we start to surmount a number of our public policy challenges.

Conclusion

Today, Nigeria seems unhealthy and frail at many levels. A cursory review of her health statistics from the state, local and federal levels show that much remains to be done. Mortality levels are at unacceptably and morally shameful levels. Yet, the will to act seems missing, despite ever growing budgetary commitments to the sector. I believe that what is missing is an integrated view that places at its heart, a system of ideas anchored around individual themes of improving productivity, and leveraging a willingness to embrace risk as a step towards transformation. Only by bringing new ideas into the public space for healthcare interventions can we address the needs of Nigerians, while using the space as a platform for promoting entrepreneurship, risk taking and double balance scorecard initiatives. I urge all stakeholders to embrace the idea of incentives, ideas and entrepreneurial insight to drive the transformation we all want in the healthcare market. It has been my distinct pleasure to join you today and I do hope that you will join me in pushing for a transformative agenda that rewards solutions not the rhetoric of change.

Thank you.

Patrick Okedinachi Utomi

January 27th, 2010

Haiti Emergency Relief

I want to seize this opportunity to thank my dear friend Reno Omokri, who organized a relief effort for the people of Haiti as a result of the call I made on my facebook profile. The relief materials were airlifted today and should reach its recipients soon. I also want to thank others who joined this effort. From the bottom of my heart I say thank you!

Some of the relief items raised by Reno and already destined for Haiti.

Some of the relief items raised by Reno and already destined for Haiti.

Re:Until the Next Crisis

I wrote this article several months ago to warn those currently in power of the need to be proactive and act on the past reports of the previous probes on the Jos and other ethnic/religious crises. The reason we have these issues is not because we do not know the problem, rather it is because we have not had the political will to fix the known problems. Below is a reproduction of my appeal to the authorities.

PU.

It has been said that those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. This is particularly true of the Nigerian situation. We as a people have been so caught up in the rat race of survival that we have failed to take any notice of the regular recurrence of ethnic and religious crises in the country. Some have even become used to these clashes and have accepted it as a way of life. But the truth is that most if not all of these clashes are avoidable if we will only learn the lessons from the last one. But alas, our attitude is to heave a sigh of relief as soon as the crisis is contained and make some noise in the media, then forget about it after blaming it on one or two scapegoat individuals and proceed to move on with our lives as if nothing happened. Until the next crisis.

However, if we had only taken some time to reflect on the last crisis, we would have learnt lessons that would affect our behaviour and prevent the next crisis. But time and again, our leadership has shown that it has not the consistency to sustain the the process of resolving the remote and not so remote causes of these crises.

Now for instance, it would be recalled that that there was a religious/Ethnic crisis in Kaduna in 2000, and that as a result of that crisis the government set up a commission of inquiry to determine the causes of that crisis and prevent a re occurrence. However if you recall, little or nothing was done to implement that report of this commission and most importantly those behind the crisis were never unmasked nor punished and I vividly recall one of the members of that commission stating that if the previous report of the commission of inquiry that looked into the Zangon Kataf crisis in the 80s had been implemented, it would have likely prevented the Kaduna crisis. You would expect that this type of talk would lead to some proactive action, but then we had the Jos crisis soon after.

Now Jos used to be a city known for its serene atmosphere and everyone was caught off guard by the crisis that enveloped Jos in 2001. However, when the crisis re occurred with greater casualties in 2004, the government should have had some inbuilt mechanism geared towards containing the crisis. Well the government did not and so set up another commission of inquiry to again look into the causes of that crisis. Now what steps did the government take to avoid a re occurrence of that crisis? The commission’s recommendations were again swept under the carpet and then it happened again!

This time in 2008 the orgy of violence was even worse. More people died during this crisis than the two previous crisis put together, but the most painful thing is that again this crisis was foreseeable and preventable if the government had simply implemented the recommendations from previous panels of inquiry.

But what was even worse is the amount of politics engaged in by the Federal and state government after the Jos crisis, the dilly dallying and the parallel commissions set up. What we failed to understand is that some things should be beyond politics and as the elder brother the Federal Government has to show the way by leading by example and putting national interest before politics in matters such as these.

If we had done this, then perhaps the most recent crisis, the deadly ‘boko haram‘ crisis would not have happened. But happen it did and once again Nigeria was portrayed to the outside world as a nation in turmoil with potential foreign investors watching on TV the orgy of violence as human beings were beheaded, hacked to pieces in the most barbaric manner and thinking to themselves that this could be me if I go there to invest!

So now that we have contained this latest crisis, what happens? So now what? Again, so now what?

Do we heave a sigh of relief and carry on as before and say it was all Mohammed Yusuf’s fault? Or do we do the proper thing and carry out a proper post mortem of the crisis? I am not talking about another window dressing ‘panel of inquiry’ which would again be swept under the carpet like its predecessors. No! I am talking about a fact finding effort, geared towards a level headed and sober investigation into the causes of the crisis and most important to suggest ways that MUST be implemented so that we do not have a re occurrence.

Poverty is at the root of these crises. People are feeling the pressure and the rat race is taking its toll on the masses and on top of this resources are dwindling bringing out the worst in human nature. All these may perhaps be bearable, but what is unbearable is that in the midst of such grinding poverty, with people living in sqaulor, we have a political class that is so unashamedly engaged in squandermania and an opulent lifestyle as if taunting the masses and telling them that they are in some way sub human. Little effort is made at improving the standard of life of the masses. Health care, education and power are at an abysmally poor state, while our elite access health care overseas, school themselves and also school their kids abroad and escape from darkness with generators.

It is this type of environment that empowers a Mohammed Yusuf and provides him with the arsenal to mislead desperately poor people into following his movement and engaging in acts of violence as they did. It is easy to convince an illiterate that since we did not have this level of corruption when we were not so Westernized, it must be that Western education is at the root of the corruption, so we must do away with it via bloodshed.

And what is the solution? Is the solution to be found in unleashing soldiers and police to crush these folk? No! That is a reaction and it is acceptable as an emergency measure, but afterwards we need to ease the burdens of the masses and remove some of the pressures they face by a heavy and sustained investment in social services . When we do this, we will find that we are not so vulnerable to these crisis. If we invest in education and have schools that are always in session and not on strike and we implement a compulsory and comprehensive education nation wide, youths who are usually used in these crisis would have better things to occupy their minds. If we invest in power, we will see a dramatic, steady and sustained rise in small and medium scale enterprises and the economy will start to expand and when people are at work, they will have little time to take offense at miss world pageants, newspaper articles, settlers and such like.

But perhaps most importantly if we have a political elite that is more responive to the people. That is able to curb some of its opulence. That can be less thieving and more service oriented and that is headed by a true ’servant leader’ who models behaviour for the masses to emulate, we will have a public that is well behaved, investor friendly and at peace with themselves and their neighbours.

Politicians can not keep having 300 million naira weddings, multi-million naira wedding anniversary bashes, long convoys of cars that regularly get involved in fatal crashes killing hapless pedestrians and multiple guest houses maintained at public expense. We can not be having a multi billion FIFA fiesta when we have majority of our population living on less than a dollar a day. We can not spend 523 billion naira on a legislature that has produced only 523 laws that have had little impact in bringing the people out of poverty. We would have to remember that society is like a pyramid and the top flows down. Very important it is to remember that fish starts to get rotten from the head.

Also, we can not expect to take the lid of the pressure cooker that Nigerians are living in if we do not tackle the issue of free and fair elections. We need to allow people freely choose their own leaders. Leaders can not have genuine influence over their people if they are imposed on them. This is why we continue to see this disconnect between the leadership and the led were the led are suffering from crumbling social infrastructure and the leaders are accessing their social services (health care, education, banking, insurance) abroad. We need to implement the Justice Uwais Electoral Reform Committee’s recommendations chief of which is that the board and head of the INEC should not be appointed by the president but by the National Judicial Commission.

As it is with these crises, so it is with almost every aspect of our national life. In sports for instance, we perform woefully at a football, basket ball or volley ball tournament, or an Olympic games and the national mood is one of sadness. Everyone complains, but very soon, we forget about the let down and go about our normal activities and then the next tournament or Olympic games are around the corner and we start our usual ‘fire brigade’ preparations, always in crisis mode.

This is the same approach we took in the Niger Delta and now we have a full blown insurgency where we could have nipped this problem in the bud back in the 80s and 90s. We can not afford to have more Niger Delta crises around Nigeria.

Life is just like a farm, we can not plant a seed and refuse to water it, and go and play and make merry and just a few weeks to harvest time we come and start making hasty preparations, watering and manuring the crop at a time when it is too late to expect any yield from a farm that has been neglected for sooooooo long.

In closing I say to Nigeria’s current leaders that they have two choices. They can have a sober reflection on the ‘boko haram’ crisis and then do something tangible to address the causes of this incidence or they can bury their heads in the sand like the Ostrich ‘until the next crisis’.

Once again, God bless Nigeria.

PU

PS: This blog piece was published on my blog www.patitospost.com, two days before reports of the recent shiite protest/clashes in Kaduna resulted in deaths.

Diaspora Haiti Relief Efforts

We each have our problems but maybe we can spare a thought for a nation that lost 200,000 souls in one day

We each have our problems but maybe we can spare a thought for a nation that lost 200,000 souls in one day

Haiti Emergency Relief

I’m pleased to announce that my dear friend, Reno Omokri, is taking part in an airlift of relief materials meant for the victims of the Haiti Earthquake. It would be great if anyone can donate non perishable relief items like blankets, medicines, cereal, canned foods etc (No Cash Please). I will pay to have these items flown to Michigan where they will be airlifted to Haiti. The airlift is scheduled for next week, so it will be great if any donations can be made by Monday the 25th of January, 2010. You can reach Reno at 510-619-6801. Thanks a million.

PU

Thank you All for Supporting Our Haiti Relief Efforts.

I’d like to use this opportunity to thank all those who have made a donation to Nigeria Haiti Relief Effort which is currently accepting relief materials to send to Haiti for the victim of the earth quake. Please if you have not yet done so and want to join the efforts, please send relief materials (none perishable items e.g canned foods, clothes, sugar, toiletries, detergent, medicines etc) to Nigeria Haiti Relief, 6 Balarabe Musa Crescent, Victoria Island, Lagos, or if abroad to 660 Shrewsbury Dr, Clarkson, Michigan, 48348.

I’d also like to thank Syed Ali Abdul Rahman, of Friendfinder Inc in Sunnyvale California for his generous cash donation. Please make an effort, but if you can not send anything, at least please say a prayer for our Haitian Brothers.

PU.

Off Shore Presidency

The president’s call to the BBC radio today raises more questions than it answers. There are too many pressing issues in Nigeria this new year. From the Abdul Mutallab incidence to the controversy over the signing of the supplementary budget and then the controversial swearing in of the new CJN by the outgoing one as well as the recent unrest in Bauchi which claimed not a few lives and in the midst of all these our president placed a call to the BBC and did not touch on any of these issues or other pressing issues. The only thing he touched on besides his health is football! This is troubling!

Here is a president whose sole achievement in office is the amnesty in the Niger Delta and yet that very achievement is unraveling what with the recent attacks on Chevron’s pipelines and the kidnap of some Britons and a Colombian and yet there is hardly a pip squeak from Mr. President nor the government he heads and yet the Federal Executive Council tells us that his absence has not affected government. With the amnesty unraveling what will history remember Umaru Yar’adua for?

The question begging an answer is what are the president’s priorities? Here he had a chance to calm the anxieties of a troubled nation and he did not. What are we then to believe? Is it that the president is not aware of the attempted terrorist attack by Farouk? Nigeria has been blacklisted by the U.S, the Nigerian senate has issued an ultimatum to the U.S and the government purportedly headed by Umaru Yar’adua has not made any concrete efforts to show the outside world that Nigeria realises that there were some systemic lapses and that we would take steps to resolve these lapses. I mean what is going on? If the president did not comment on the issue of the attempted terrorist attack, the only conclusion that can be drawn are that he is not aware of the incidence or if he is aware then he does not care. As I have already written elsewhere, nothing the government of Nigeria is doing right now can be as effective in getting the U.S to have a rethink on the issue of Nigeria’s travel blacklisting than for our president to tell the outside world that we accept some responsibility for the incidence being that the young man is a Nigerian and that he passed through our airports and that we have identified lapses which we have taken steps to plug those loop holes and make sure that such an incidence will not happen. Such a statement coming from Nigeria’s president will be more effective than any ultimatum because in the final analysis an ultimatum issued without any consequence is an empty threat.

So what are we to do with the President’s call? Are we to receive assurances from this call? Even Yar’adua himself confessed that he ‘hopes that there will be tremendous progress’. In short Nigeria is relying on chance and hope? A nation of 150 million people are holding their breath. But why? And to further add insult to injury the Federal Government yesterday told us in court that we are not entitled to the president’s medical records even though which we are collectively paying his medical bills. This is not some stone age empire living under a despot that we dare not question. Nigeria is a democracy or supposedly so, why cant we be told the truth about our own leader? Why cant we be addressed by our president on television? Why this secrecy?

It is Nigerians who have been praying for Yar’adua, paying his bills and paying the price of his absence. The least he can do is to address us on NTA, AIT or FRCN and speak to us on those issues that are critical to us . I still can not fathom why a man who styles himself as a ’servant leader’ will be so hell bent on sticking to power rather than temporarily handing over to his vice so that his nation can function properly. That is the true action of a servant leader. What a pity!

Finally, let me state on a lighter note that we had hoped that the off shore/on shore dichotomy had perished with the Obasanjo administration with the pronouncement of the Supreme Court on the matter, however we have now been undeceived because right now we have an off shore president and we desperately need judicial intervention once again!

Once again, God bless Nigeria,

PU.

Charity Begins at Home

Imagine my surprise when I picked up the paper today and discovered that the National Assembly has issued a seven day ultimatum to the United States government asking them to rescind their decision to include Nigeria on a list of countries blacklisted for terrorism activities or else. I mean this was the same National Assembly that told us their hands were tied on the issue of acting decisvely on President Yar’adua continued absence from duty yet their hands are not tied over this issue. Which has a more negative impact on Nigeria? You have yet to issue an ultimatum to your president to identify his state of mind and his location and yet you want to control events in another county.

The truth is that if President Obama had been able to contact President Yar’adua directly after the Farouk Abdul Mutallab incidence to have high level discussions and received assurances of Nigeria’s commitment to the fight against terrorism from the highest level the blacklisting may not have occurred. But there was no one for President Obama to reach out to. The Vice president is understandably unable to act without being constitutionally empowered to do so and the FEC are self serving in wanting to protect their jobs so they do nothing which leaves the National Assembly to salvage the leadership vaccuum, but rather than do this they bury their heads in the sand like the Ostrich. President Obama is concerned and involved in this issue and has spoken, Prime Minister Gordon Blair is concerned and involved and has also spoken, Yemeni President Abdullah Saleh is involved and has spoken, why the deafening silence from our own president, Umaru Yar’adua in these trying times?

Now what would happen after the 7 day ultimatum? Obviously the U.S is not going to change its stance, so what will the National Assembly do. If you issue an ultimatum, there ought to at least be some consequence to the person or body that does not meet the terms of your ultimatum. If the National Assembly is unable to do anything after the ultimatum expires (which is most likely) then of what use has the ultimatum been beyond empty sloganeering or at best a knee jerk approach. Are they going to stop flying to the U.S for shopping trips and medical treatments? Will they refrain from sending their wards to school there? Would they stop importing goods from America? Would they also reject foreign aid from the U.S? In fact can they boast of doing anything to America that will hurt America more than themselves? It is actually more effective for them to reach out to President Yar’adua wherever he is and ask him to intervene directly to the U.S President and give the reassurance the U.S requires that Nigeria will do what it takes to increase her anti terrorism efforts. Our parliamentarians have to think globally and ACT locally!

Today as I write this, Nigeria’s foreign minister has just told the BBC that he has not spoken to the president since he was evacuated from the country on November 23rd, 2009 and yet the government claims that he is ‘responding to treatment and getting better’. Even further we are told that he is in charge of Nigeria from Saudi Arabia. Upon what basis are these assurances given when people at the highest levels have not seen or heard from the president?

As it stands now, Nigeria is turning into a laughing stock in the International Community. It is so ridiculous that the government’s defense in court to the suit filed by Femi Falana in which he requested for the president’s medical report is that the medical reports are ‘private’. Was that a joke? Private? Nigerian tax payers are paying for President Yar’adua’s medical treatments. They are said to have ‘elected’ him after he put himself up for election into a ‘public office’ to be their president making him an employee of over 140 million Nigerians. President Yar’adua’s medical state are a lot of things but one thing they are not is PRIVATE! If he wishes his medical records to be private, he ought to first resign from public office and pay his own medical bills. When he does so then we will accept that they are private.

As for the National Assembly I only have this piece of advise-if the owner of a calabash calls it a worthless calabash others will help him use the calabash to carry thrash. If our parliamentarians can say publicly that their hands are tied from intervening in the current vacuum in leadership that has left Nigeria prostrate they should not blame others who heard what they said and concluded that since no one is in charge and no one will intervene the best approach would then be to paint us all with the same brush which is what the blacklisting has done.

Once again, God bless Nigeria.

PU.